by: Hayes Hunt and Brian Kint Federal prosecutors in Roger Clemens’ perjury trial may have made a costly error after Andy Pettitte testified that he was “50-50” about a conversation he had with Clemens regarding his use of human growth…
Blog Archives
Andy Pettitte’s “50-50” Testimony – Roger Clemens’ Trial
Tagged with: Andy Pettitte, Federal Rule of Evidence 607, FRE 401, HGH, Roger Clemens
Posted in Trial
Posted in Trial
Preview of the Roger Clemens Trial: The Rocket Faces a Challenging Lineup
By Stephen A. Miller (Orig. published 7/11/11) In the 2000 World/Subway Series, Roger Clemens hurled a broken bat at Mike Piazza. In hindsight, we can ask: Was it “roid rage”? Clemens now finds himself on trial this week in a…
Tagged with: Andy Pettite, Barry Bonds, Criminal Law, From the Sidebar, Hayes Hunt, House Committee on Oversight and Reform, Jury, Lying to Congress, McNamee, Performance-Enhancing Drugs, Perjury Obstruction of Justice, Roger Clemens, Roid Rage, Stephen Miller, Steroids, Trial, Witnesses
Posted in Cross Examination
Posted in Cross Examination
Double Jeopardy and Roger Clemens
Less than two months ago, U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton declared a mistrial in the Roger Clemens case after the prosecutors played an inadmissible video clip to the jury. Judge Walton said the experienced prosecutors made a mistake that…
Tagged with: acceptance of responsibility, Criminal Law, double jeopardy, double jeopardy clause, double jeopardy waiver, Fifth Amendment, Hayes Hunt, inadmissible evidence, Judge Reggie Walton, obstruction of justice, perjury, prosecutor's conduct, reprosecution, retrial, Roger Clemens
Posted in Prosecution & Defense
Posted in Prosecution & Defense
