Criminal Background Screening - Employers & Corporate Counsel

criminal background.jpgBy Hayes Hunt and Jonathan Cavalier

So how can employers implement beneficial, effective criminal background screening in their hiring processes while ensuring that they remain in compliance with the law? A few simple steps will go a long way.

1. Draft a written background check policy that complies with the law.

Any employer choosing to use criminal background checks as part of a hiring process should have a policy. The policy should be written in clear, plain language and made available to applicants. It should state that the employer will use the background check to search for criminal history that has a direct relationship to the job at issue, and that only those criminal convictions will be considered. The policy should also expressly state that the employer is an equal opportunity employer and that it will not discriminate on the basis of any protected characteristic in the use of background checks or in hiring decisions. Finally, the employer may consider providing candidates not hired because of the existence of criminal convictions the opportunity to discuss the conviction with the employer.

2. Follow the policy in performing background checks and making hiring decisions.

If an employer has a background check policy, it must be followed. All applicants for a given job should be screened. Screening must not be used selectively or on an individual basis. Doing sodiscrimination.jpg is a recipe for a discrimination lawsuit. The employer must also make sure that anyone involved in hiring or background screening is trained on the employer's policy and on how to implement and follow it. Interviewers should be prepared to field questions from applicants about the screening policy and what it means if an applicant has a criminal conviction. Finally, the employer must abide by the policy and only consider convictions that have a direct impact on the applicant's fitness for the particular job at issue.

 

3. Document everything, including the reasons for hiring decisions.

background check.jpgIf criminal background screening is performed on applicants, the fact that a check was performed and its results should be made part of the applicant's file. If a conviction is uncovered and that conviction is used in evaluating the applicant, the employer should document the ways in which the conviction is related to the job at issue and the weight given to the conviction in evaluating the applicant. If the applicant is not hired or given further consideration solely or partly due to a conviction, the employer should document that fact. If the employer disregards the conviction and hires the applicant, the reasons for that decision should be documented as well. Finally, the employer should provide an applicant who was not hired based on the existence of a criminal conviction a copy of the background check and the reasons for nonhire.

4. Consider outsourcing.

Often, an employer can shift the downside risk for criminal background screening to a third party by hiring a vendor to perform the screens. If an employer chooses this method, the employer should be sure that the contract clearly spells out which party will bear responsibility for discrimination or negligent hiring claims. The employer may also want to insist on an indemnification, if possible, from the vendor.

This law on the use of criminal background checks in hiring decisions is extremely dynamic and is under constant scrutiny from both advocates and opponents. Consideration is constantly being given to proposed changes in the laws at the federal, state and local levels. Other local governments are considering ordinances similar to "Ban the Box." Lobbying groups are pushing hard for similar laws on the state and local levels. Employers utilizing criminal screening processes and interview questions must know the law in each area in which they do businesspolicy&procedure.jpg and monitor for changes in those laws. Most of us believe, deep down, in second chances. However, businesses must be vigilant in employment decisions by using background checks.

By implementing reasonable, written policies on criminal background checks, documenting the reasons for hire and paying careful attention to the law, employers can reap the benefits of applicant screening and reduce liability.

Published in The Legal Intelligencer on August 8, 2012

Comments (2)

Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the end
Neil - September 26, 2012 5:12 PM

"Finally, the employer should provide an applicant who was not hired based on the existence of a criminal conviction a copy of the background check and the reasons for nonhire."

Providing someone a specific reason for not hiring them seems like it might be risky. Isn't it safer to keep it to "we found a more suitable candidate"? Especially since there are so many possible reasons to not hire someone and so much of it is subjective?

The only reason I ask is that if you provide that to someone, it would seem that all they need do then is find someone with the same (or worse) conviction, that you did hire, and they've got a case. If you provided no specific reason, wouldn't it be tougher to prove that the person you did end up hiring didn't interview better, have more relevant experience, etc?

Jon Cavalier - September 28, 2012 8:18 AM

Neil: excellent question. In fact, many employers operate in precisely the manner that you suggest. Doing so, however, may lead to trouble down the road.

First, if an employer has taken the time to draft and implement a background checking policy, they are best served by following it. Doing so provides clear documentation of the reasons for nonhire, which will in turn permit an employer to take full advantage of any safe harbors available under the relevant state statutes or local ordinances, and will also provide an excellent defense against a potential suit. If there are other reasons that, along with the background check, caused the decision not to hire, these reasons should be documented as well.

However, simply conveying to a nonhired candidate that "someone more suitable for the position" was chosen thwarts the very purpose of the policy itself. In such a scenario, the employer may run afoul of statutes that require informing a candidate that a criminal background check played a role in the employer's decision not to hire. For example, in Pennsylvania, 18 Pa. C.S.A. ยง 9125 requires the employer to notify the applicant in writing of its reliance on a criminal conviction as part of a decision not to hire the applicant.

Finally, you asked whether informing a nonhired applicant of reliance on a criminal conviction would allow the applicant to simply find someone with the same (or a worse) conviction that the employer did hire and sue. You're correct -- this is precisely why an employer benefits from drafting and implementing a clear policy and following it across the board. As noted in the article, "all applicants for a given job should be screened." It is a recipe for disaster for an employer to fail to follow its own policy in this regard. This is also why it is important for the employer to train personnel involved in hiring on the particulars and requirements of the policy so that those responsible to background checking applicants understand that the policy must be applied uniformly.

Thanks for your question. I hope this response is useful to you.

Jon Cavalier

Post a comment

Fill out this form to add a comment to the discussion
I'd like to leave a comment. is
,
is
,
is
is